FROM THE FOUNDATION

Redefining the Safety Net

Should California establish a Basic Health Program for certain low-income residents? CHCF's Marian Mulkey captures a recent policy conversation in a Health Affairs blog.

Accountable Care in Action

A new post on the Health Affairs blog details how CalPERS kept costs down in Sacramento through a "virtual" ACO with insurers and providers.

Career Opportunity: Senior Program Officer

This position will play a major role in furthering the goals and objectives of the foundation's Better Chronic Disease Care program.

Medi-Cal

Tuesday, February 07, 2012

CMS Rejects California's Plan To Require Medi-Cal Copayments

On Monday, CMS said that California cannot require Medi-Cal beneficiaries to take on copayments for physician visits and prescription drug purchases, the Sacramento Bee's "Capitol Alert" reports. Medi-Cal is California's Medicaid program (Yamamura, "Capitol Alert," Sacramento Bee, 2/6).

Background

The copay proposal was passed as part of last year's state budget. Gov. Jerry Brown (D) and state lawmakers said the requirement would save $511 million annually.

Under the proposal, Medi-Cal beneficiaries would have been required to pay:

  • A maximum of $200 for hospital stays;
  • $50 for an emergency department visit;
  • $5 for visiting a physician or dentist visit; and
  • $3 for certain prescription drugs (Lin, AP/San Francisco Chronicle, 2/6).

Details of CMS' Decision

CMS acting Administrator Marilyn Tavenner said that while she supports the "goal of promoting cost-effective use of health care services," federal law prohibits states from requiring copays for medical insurance programs that aid low-income residents (Lavelle, U-T San Diego, 2/6).

She added that federal officials were "unable to identify the legal and policy support" for the copays (Kleffman, San Jose Mercury News, 2/6).

State Response

H.D. Palmer -- a spokesperson for the state Department of Finance -- said that California will appeal the decision.

He said that if the decision is not reversed, the state would have to spend an additional $575 million in the next fiscal year (Megerian, "PolitiCal," Los Angeles Times, 2/6).



Readers are invited to send feedback to: chl@chcf.org

Click to register for California Healthline